StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
This case study "Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State" focuses on the People Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner in this case, that is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the United States Department of State…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.6% of users find it useful
Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State"

Case Brief May 12, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v. United s Department of 613 F.3d 220, and (D.C. Cir. 2010). Parties People Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI), the petitioner, in this case, is a political group in Iran while the Respondent was the United States Department of State. Facts Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council in the late 1990s authorized sanctions on certain terrorist organizations and entities. However, it left the modalities to its member states to operationalize the national listing of individual organizations and persons and to implement the sanctions.

In the United States, such organizations were listed as Foreign Terrorist Organizations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). AEDPA gave the secretary of state powers to designate an organization as FTO for a period of two years. The effects of such a listing are dire. For instance, the secretary of the treasury department can freeze all the assets of such an organization. Members of an FTO are prohibited from entering into the United States and any person who provides material support to such an organization risks a fine and/or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 15 years (Nizkor, 2012).

After the lapse of the two years, the secretary of state was required to either renew the designation or not, and if s/he did not, the designation would be allowed to lapse. However, this requirement was amended to the effect that such designation did not lapse but after every two years organization listed as such could file a petition for delisting. The Act requires that the Secretary of State shall Act on such a petition within 180 days. The Secretary is required to revoke the listing if s/he finds that either the circumstances that led to such listing have ceased or if the national security required so.

In doing so, the secretary could rely on classified and/or unclassified information. If the secretary refuses the revocation, the organization can seek review within 30 days of such a decision. PMOI was first listed as PMOI in 1997, and the designation was subsequently renewed in 2003. On July 15, 2008, PMOI filed such a petition, listing several grounds among them that it had renounced terror, had been sharing intelligence with the government regarding Iran's nuclear program and that indeed its members had received protection under the Geneva convention.

On January 7, 2009, the secretary denied the petition based on several grounds. Prior proceeding Consequently, PMOI applied for courts review on the grounds that the secretary’s finding lacked substantial support and that the secretary failed to accord it due process (In Re: People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, Petitioner,2012). The court ruled in its favor and ordered the secretary to avail the unclassified information she had relied on, and instructed her to indicate which sources she found to be sufficient to maintain the designation.

The court also made several orders, but which the secretary was slow in complying with. However, the unclassified material was later on availed to PMOI on October 18 2010 by the Department of Justice (DOJ) acting on behalf of the Secretary. It required PMOI to make submissions on the same which it duly did. However, since then, no action had been taken despite numerous correspondences between the two. Therefore on 27th February 2012, PMOI applied for an order of mandamus. Issues Did the secretary’s delay in making a decision on PMOI’s petition entitle them to a judicial review order?

Arguments The petitioner argued that it had denounced terrorism, which was evidenced by the fact that, following 2001, no act of violence had taken place, that was attributed to it. Moreover, its members had been classified as combatants under the Geneva Convention after a thorough vetting by US forces, which had established no element of criminality. To add, it argued that failure to delist was merely political, to avoid sparking a reaction from Iran. The petitioners argued that it was a clear intention of congress to provide for judicial review for such listing since congress had refused to insulate FTO designation from courts.

The statutory time limit of 180 had passed and the secretary’s actions were to merely frustrate any review. In addition, the petitioner argued that continued listing predisposed its members to violence, such as a recent attack on its camp Ashraf by Iraq forces based on FTO listing. Ruling The court held that the secretary’s delay in acting on the PMOI’s petition was ‘egregious’. The court also held that failure by the secretary to act on its orders effectively nullified a remand mandate it had issued in 2010.

The court refused to immediately issue an order of mandamus because the matter touched on national security and foreign policy. Instead, the court ordered the secretary to either allow or reject the petition within four months, failure of which the court would issue an order of mandamus. Rationale The failure by the secretary to make a decision was putting the petitioner in administrative limbo, by maintaining PMOI’s listing and denying the petitioner opportunity to seek review. Thus the failure to act insulated her decision from the court's review.

In addition, the secretary’s failure to act within the statutory limit of 180 days balanced in favor of granting the order of mandamus, since such a timeline manifests the intention that the secretary must act promptly. In addition, unlike other instances of national security where the court exercises judicial restraint, in this scenario the congress had empowered the court to review the decision of the secretary. Works Cited Nizkor, Equipo. (2012). U.S. Court Issues Writ of Mandamus, Effectively Removing Organization from Terror List: In Re People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran.

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department Case Study”, n.d.)
People's Moujahedin Organization of Iran v. United States Department Case Study. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v
(People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study)
People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study. https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v.
“People'S Moujahedin Organization of Iran V. United States Department Case Study”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1478166-peopleyies-moujahedin-organization-of-iran-v.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Mojahedin Organization of Iran Versus United States Department of State

How does the Islamic religion influence Islamic law

Literally, the word ‘islam' means submission to the Almighty God.... The teachings and ideologies of the Prophet Muhammad are embedded in Islam.... For the people who follow Islam, Quran is the Word of God.... ... ... ... Literally, the word ‘islam' means submission to the Almighty God.... The teachings and ideologies of the Prophet Muhammad are embedded in Islam....
23 Pages (5750 words) Essay

Tajikistan Civil War

Country data as compiled by the US department of state is as follows.... Language: Tajik (the official state language as of 1994, with follow-up legislation in 2009); Russian is widely used in government and business; 74% of the population lives in rural communities where mostly Tajik is spoken.... rom 1992 to 1997 internal fighting ensued between old-guard regionally-based ruling elites and disenfranchised regions, democratic liberal reformists, and Islamists loosely organized in a united Tajik Opposition (UTO)....
25 Pages (6250 words) Research Paper

People's Mujahidin Organization of Iran v. United States Department of State

united states department of state [Author] [Institution] Introduction The people's Mujahidin of Iran, commonly known as the Mujahedeen e Khalq (Mek as it will be referred), is an exile Iranian Organization which has been popularly known to be working to overthrow the regime of the Islamic Republic of Iran.... department of state.... The MeK claims that it has halted all of its terrorist activities since 2001, with valid proof, and the decision of the department of state to keep the organization listed in the FTO in 2008 and 2003 is unfair....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Prevent Strategy Failure with Young Somali Men

According to reports presented to the Parliament by the Prime Minister and Secretary of the state for the Home Department, Al Qaida recruited people from the country and established their network in the UK.... During the early part of 1990s propagandists for terrorism in Algeria and Egypt had settled down in UK, and the emerging violent Islamic organisations encouraged the participation of different people (specially the Islamic people, who were in the UK) in violent Jihad overseas (The united Kingdom's strategy for countering International Terrorism, 2009,pp....
44 Pages (11000 words) Dissertation

Crime Prevention and Control Policies

This case study "Crime Prevention and Control Policies" discusses terrorism as extreme criminal activities carried out by brainwashed fanatics often educated and highly sophisticated.... Countries are investing a lot of money to deter and stop terrorism.... ... ... ... No country is safe.... There are over a hundred and thirty terrorist groups across the world....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

How does the Islamic Religion Influence Islamic Law

This paper, How does the Islamic Religion Influence Islamic Law, highlights that the word 'islam' means submission to the Almighty God.... The teachings and ideologies of the Prophet Muhammad are embedded in Islam.... For the people who follow Islam, the Quran is the Word of God.... .... ... ... As the paper outlines, the finer aspects of Islam and the Islamic Law are ingrained in the holy Quran....
49 Pages (12250 words) Assignment

Tajikistan Civil War

The author explains that Tajikistan's neighbors in the region, in particular, Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation, maintain great influence over the course of internal Tajik politics, and neither state has behaved as if it considered Tajikistan a genuinely sovereign and independent country.... Language: Tajik (the official state language as of 1994, with follow-up legislation in 2009); Russian is widely used in government and business; 74% of the population lives in rural communities where mostly Tajik is spoken....
12 Pages (3000 words) Research Paper

Domestic versus Transnational Terrorism

This was a time when violence was at its peak in French state and killed approximately 40,000 people in less than one year.... ince the taking over of Mosul by the Islamic state of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a state of confusion has increased in the whole world regarding its origin, goals, tactics, objectives, and their nature of attacks.... This paper "Domestic versus Transnational Terrorism" focuses on the terrorism - a word that emerged during the French revolution during the reign of terror....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us