StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Evaluation of Bouwsma's Argument - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
(Name) (Professor) (Subject) (Date) Evaluation of Bouwsma’s Argument The argument of Bouwsma is not valid, particularly because of the major premise (1) and the minor premises (2) and (3). For the purposes of clarity, the premises will be represented as: (1) If we are deceived about the world around us (A), either we are able to detect the deception through our five sense (B) or we are not able to detect the deception through our five senses (B-)…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Evaluation of Bouwsmas Argument
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Evaluation of Bouwsma's Argument"

Evaluation of Bouwsma’s Argument The argument of Bouwsma is not valid, particularly because of the major premise(1) and the minor premises (2) and (3). For the purposes of clarity, the premises will be represented as: (1) If we are deceived about the world around us (A), either we are able to detect the deception through our five sense (B) or we are not able to detect the deception through our five senses (B-). (2) If we are able to detect the deception through our five senses (B), then we are not deceived about the world around (A-). (3) If we are not able to detect the deception through our five senses (B-), then we are not deceived about the world around us (A-). (4) We are not deceived about the world around us (A-).

If we closely analyze the argument above as Bouwsma put it, we will notice in the major premise (1) that A is either B or B-. He then proceeds to prove in the minor premises (2) and (3) that B = A- and that B- = A-, and so he concludes that A- is true, thus implying that A in the major premise is not true. What Bouwsma is trying to say here is that simply because B and B- actually lead to A-, then it is A- that is true and not A. Nevertheless, without analyzing the content of the premises, the minor premises (2) and (3) commit a fault since they contradict the major premise (1).

Based on the major premise, A = either B or B-. Therefore, if A = B, then A ? B-; or if A = B-, then A ? B, because whatever happens, A must either be B or B-. In short, one of these two possibilities must necessarily be true. There is actually no way that A, or Descartes’ claim that we are deceived about the world around us, can be proven false if it is stated in a major premise. The reason is that if A is not B, then it must be B-; or if it is not B-, then it must be B, regardless of whether B or B- is false.

It is like saying that John is either a bird or a fish. It therefore means that if John is not a bird, then he must be a fish; and if he is not a fish, then he must be a bird – regardless of whether the conclusion is true, and regardless of whether both terms “bird” and “fish” are nonexistent and are not even concepts. Using this argument about John, the bird and the fish, what Bouwma did was to say that either John is a bird or a fish, and then prove that neither bird nor fish point to John, so therefore John does not exist.

What then is the use of the major premise if the possibilities are not exhaustive? After all, Bouwma’s major premise is actually “John is a fish, or a bird or does not exist.” Likewise, in our original argument, Bouwma’s major premise is wrongly stated and should have been: (1) “If we are deceived about the world around us, there are three possibilities: we are able to detect the deception through our five senses (and it is true that we are deceived), or we are not able to detect the deception (and it is true that we are deceived), or it is NOT true that we are deceived.

” Bouwsma should therefore have stated in the major premise (1) that there are actually three possibilities, because either of the two possibilities he gave would still mean that it is true that we are deceived about the world around us. Bouwsma is like a teacher telling his student that if he is diligent, then he either does his homework or does not do it, and then later on tells him that whether he does his homework or not, he is not diligent, and finally concludes that he is not diligent.

Do you think this would make sense to the student? Something is actually wrong with the minor premises (2) and (3). The reason is that they contradict the major premise. The minor premises must therefore be: (2) If we are able to detect the deception through our five senses, then it is NOT true that we are not able to detect the deception through our five senses; and the other premise must be (3) If we are not able to detect the deception through our five senses, then it is NOT true that we are able to detect the deception through our five senses.

Based on Bouwma’s revised major and minor premises, the pattern is now “Either P or Q; Not P; Therefore Q.” In short, deception is either detected or undetected; if detected, then it is not undetected; and if undetected, it is not detected. However, since the minor premises (2) and (3) only present possibilities, then no conclusion can be made. The idea of deception therefore remains true. Perhaps, the only valid way that Bouwsma could prove that “we are not deceived about the world around us,” is by using this argument: (1) If we are deceived about the world around us, there are three possibilities: we are able to detect the deception through our five senses, or we are not able/unable to detect the deception, or it is not true that we are deceived. (2) We are neither able nor unable to detect the deception through our five senses. (3) It is not true that we are deceived.

= We are not deceived about the world around us. However, if this is the case, then people would have difficulty understanding “neither able nor unable” in the minor premise (2). Top of Form Bottom of Form

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluation of Bouwsma's Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1395734-argument
(Evaluation of Bouwsma'S Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1395734-argument.
“Evaluation of Bouwsma'S Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/finance-accounting/1395734-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evaluation of Bouwsma's Argument

Rationalism versus Empiricism in the Philosophic Debates

empiricism was among the most complex philosophic debates.... Generally, people are being divided into the two broad categories: those who rely on rational judgments about the reality (rationalists) and those, who ground their… In the history of philosophy, Plato is fairly regarded as one of the major proponents of rationalism, while John Locke is among those, who defend their sensual positions and are I believe that in our judgments about reality we cannot abstract ourselves from the sensual reactions and subjective judgments; as a result, empiricism is the philosophy that is closer to the reality and reflects the true way of judging and evaluating the surrounding reality....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Evaluate an argument from the Bouwsma reading

The first argument states that if we are deceived about the world around us, either we are able to detect the deception through the five senses, or we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses.... Thus, if we are able to detect deception through the five senses, we are not deceived about the world around us, but if we are not able to detect Evaluate an argument from the Bouwsma Reading The first argument s that if we are deceived about the world around us, either we are able to detect the deception through the five senses, or we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Argument Against Wearing Uniforms in School

In the paper “argument Against Wearing Uniforms in School” the author analyzes an issue over whether students should be made to wear school uniforms.... hellip; According to the researcher, the argument in support of school uniforms is based on the very simple  theory that uniforms erase bullying, social status, and clique mentality in schools....  This is an argument supported by Alistair Endersby who explained in his argumentative paper (“Should School Uniforms Be Got Rid Of?...
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Argument of evaluation

Considering his age when he got first elected (at age 69, the oldest-ever Full Baldwin ENG 191 (argument of Evaluation) 31 January (estimated word count = 296) The Greatest American President EverThis paper argues that among all the great American presidents, it is former president Ronald Reagan who stands above the rest....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Evaluating Arguments about consumerism

The divergent consumer behavior of people across… This paper gives a comprehensive analysis of an argument about consumerism in relation to two articles, ‘Keeping Up With Gateses and ‘The The paper summarizes and analyzes the two essays that present viewpoints on consumer culture in America before evaluating their efficacy....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Analysing and evaluating arguments

This argument is inductive in that it allows room for performance of experimentations to establish whether it is true that diets with low fat and lots of fibre are absolute cure for all illnesses.... This implies that this is just an ANALYSING AND EVALUATING ARGUMENTS Activity Two: Inductive argument This argument is inductive in that it allows room for performance of experimentations to establish whether it is true that diets with low fat and lots of fibre are absolute cure for all illnesses....
1 Pages (250 words) Coursework

Evaluation of an Argument

The essay "evaluation of an Argument" evaluates the validity, degree of soundness, and truth of the premises of the following argument: some sound arguments are valid, some valid arguments are arguments with false premises, some arguments with false premises are arguments with mood and figure OAO-2.... This essay evaluates the validity, degree of soundness, and truth of the premises of the following argument: some sound arguments are valid, some valid arguments are arguments with false premises, some arguments with false premises are arguments with mood and figure OAO-2....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Bouwsmas Argument in Descartes Evil Genius

The paper "bouwsma's argument in Descartes Evil Genius" describes that being one with Tom and his senses implies converging to the truth materialized by these senses so the deceiver settles at no other possible saving choice than comprehend the meaninglessness of the illusions he has built.... n responding to Descartes' argument via the evil demon hypothesis, Bouwsma necessitates the presence of a character that would be designated in the sphere of deception and correspondingly react to the tests over which his sense perceptions are given....
6 Pages (1500 words) Literature review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us